<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing tinytlf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=introducing-tinytlf</link>
	<description>//the blog of Paul Taylor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,  Do you have any imminent plans to support tables?  Also, is this editor able to support both absolute and relational positions? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,  Do you have any imminent plans to support tables?  Also, is this editor able to support both absolute and relational positions? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warholic</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>warholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>:,; that seems to be a great topic, i really love it ~.`</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:,; that seems to be a great topic, i really love it ~.`</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Taylor</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Sev,
Great points. I&#039;ve spent a large amount of time on new features, while still focusing on keeping the framework modular. There are some optimizations you can make at the FTE level whenever you need performance like you&#039;re describing, and I&#039;ve tried to keep those exposed in the framework.

Unfortunately I haven&#039;t focused on keeping the components very modular. As it stands right now, the components pull from every project that makes up the framework, so you&#039;re absolutely right. I&#039;m trying to get everything in the framework up to a certain level of quality, then I plan on building out the components for better general use. But I&#039;m only one guy ;).

I generally agree with this: make it work, then make it elegant, then make it fast. I think I&#039;m somewhere between step two and three.

Thanks for the interest, would love to get feedback on what documentation or features you need, and maybe even some github pull requests :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sev,<br />
Great points. I&#8217;ve spent a large amount of time on new features, while still focusing on keeping the framework modular. There are some optimizations you can make at the FTE level whenever you need performance like you&#8217;re describing, and I&#8217;ve tried to keep those exposed in the framework.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t focused on keeping the components very modular. As it stands right now, the components pull from every project that makes up the framework, so you&#8217;re absolutely right. I&#8217;m trying to get everything in the framework up to a certain level of quality, then I plan on building out the components for better general use. But I&#8217;m only one guy ;).</p>
<p>I generally agree with this: make it work, then make it elegant, then make it fast. I think I&#8217;m somewhere between step two and three.</p>
<p>Thanks for the interest, would love to get feedback on what documentation or features you need, and maybe even some github pull requests :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sev</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Sev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul

Fancy stuff - although I only was able to have a short look so far. What I&#039;m most concerned is speed. You write:


&quot;The speed you expect from a TextField, the power you expect from a Text Engine.&quot;

and that sounds most promising. Unfortunately when creating a simple Hello world speed test (just creating 10000 textfields, adding some text) I see a *massive* decrease (&gt;100x) in speed compared to the bad old flash.text.TextField. Can you elaborate a bit more where speed comes in? (or what I should do different?)

The other thing is size: This simple test mentioned before is (release built) 66kb. That&#039;s not nothing. So may be it just packs a load of features in it, just in case - that&#039;s probably reasonable, but I&#039;ve got to say, that adding this to an existing framework can have quite an impact. I just wonder: why does it have to be that fad? Or rather: can I prevent it from becoming fad?

While digging deeper into ur code, the last question might become obsolete, but for the speed, i&#039;d really love to hear your thoughts and experiences. Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul</p>
<p>Fancy stuff &#8211; although I only was able to have a short look so far. What I&#8217;m most concerned is speed. You write:</p>
<p>&#8220;The speed you expect from a TextField, the power you expect from a Text Engine.&#8221;</p>
<p>and that sounds most promising. Unfortunately when creating a simple Hello world speed test (just creating 10000 textfields, adding some text) I see a *massive* decrease (&gt;100x) in speed compared to the bad old flash.text.TextField. Can you elaborate a bit more where speed comes in? (or what I should do different?)</p>
<p>The other thing is size: This simple test mentioned before is (release built) 66kb. That&#8217;s not nothing. So may be it just packs a load of features in it, just in case &#8211; that&#8217;s probably reasonable, but I&#8217;ve got to say, that adding this to an existing framework can have quite an impact. I just wonder: why does it have to be that fad? Or rather: can I prevent it from becoming fad?</p>
<p>While digging deeper into ur code, the last question might become obsolete, but for the speed, i&#8217;d really love to hear your thoughts and experiences. Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavon</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Lavon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>This is really cool. I did a little experiment with tlf text to print ready pdfs. http://bit.ly/9rLD3a I look forward to giving your framework a try and seeing what I can come up with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really cool. I did a little experiment with tlf text to print ready pdfs. <a href="http://bit.ly/9rLD3a" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9rLD3a</a> I look forward to giving your framework a try and seeing what I can come up with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliotrock</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>elliotrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Fantastic stuff. I am glad you have considered gestures. It will be interesting to see this working on Android2.2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic stuff. I am glad you have considered gestures. It will be interesting to see this working on Android2.2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Taylor</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 02:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stade</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-806</guid>
		<description>VERY cool stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY cool stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reelfernandes</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>reelfernandes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 02:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Cool, was just about to ask the same question  = )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, was just about to ask the same question  = )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Taylor</title>
		<link>http://guyinthechair.com/2010/08/introducing-tinytlf/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyinthechair.com/?p=515#comment-631</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t typically check in binary files to git. When I get to a 1.0 I&#039;ll have official downloads, packages, etc, but till then I figure the people who&#039;d likely use it are smart enough to know what to do w/ an ant task, or at least load the projects into FB and compile the source there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t typically check in binary files to git. When I get to a 1.0 I&#8217;ll have official downloads, packages, etc, but till then I figure the people who&#8217;d likely use it are smart enough to know what to do w/ an ant task, or at least load the projects into FB and compile the source there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

